Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Bourassa favoured to stay Liberal

With Denis Coderre resigning his seat in the House of Commons to launch his run to be the next mayor of Montreal, the city's riding of Bourassa is up for grabs. As the first by-election to take place in Quebec - the scene of the most dramatic political realignment in recent memory - the contest acts as a test for the three parties whose futures lies most in the hands of Quebecers.

In the end, however, it might not prove to be such an interesting race. The riding has been a Liberal stronghold for most of its history, with the party having won 10 of 12 elections. And when the Liberals did win, they tended to take it by double-digit margins. Only in 1988 and in 1993, when the Liberals lost the riding by less than 1,000 votes to the Progressive Conservatives and the Bloc Québécois (respectively), was the riding painted anything but red.

It has certainly helped that the Liberals were represented by Coderre, one of the most visible Quebec MPs the Liberals have. Before 2011, he had never won Bourassa by less than 11 points. The New Democrats did give him a run in that election, pushing him down to 40.9% support (the lowest vote share the Liberals have ever had in the riding), but he nevertheless had an 8.6-point cushion. The New Democrats finished with 32.3% of the vote and the Bloc Québécois with 16.1%.

When the New Democrats were polling well in Quebec last year, Bourassa might have been truly up for grabs. When the Bloc was briefly ahead in the province before Thomas Mulcair became leader, they might have even had a chance. But with the Liberals surging in Quebec and both the NDP and Bloc taking a big hit in support, the riding has to be considered a very safe one for the Liberals.

ThreeHundredEight's by-election forecast model (11 for 11 so far!) considers Bourassa a Strong Liberal riding, and does not expect that the Liberals will lose it. The only wildcard at this point is the identity of the candidates, but by the time the by-election is called perhaps the political landscape in Quebec will have shifted again. 

As it stands, however, the Liberals would have to nominate a horrible candidate, and the NDP a stellar one, for this riding to not remain in the Liberal camp. The Bloc shouldn't be a factor, and that is why Daniel Paillé is almost certain not to take a run at the riding. The Conservatives are a complete non-player in Montreal, and the Greens less so (they took 8.8% and 1.6% of the vote, respectively, in 2011).

If Bourassa hadn't had an MP like Coderre, it could have been swept up in the NDP's tidal wave in 2011. All else being equal, his departure would have certainly made this riding a difficult one for the Liberals to hold. But with Liberal support surging so dramatically, it seems unthinkable that the Liberals would not be able to retain this riding in a new by-election. A loss here would be a catastrophic blow to Justin Trudeau.

But perhaps the race is not as much of a slam dunk as the provincial swing would suggest. A poll that went unnoticed was released by Forum Research a little while ago, showing that the Liberals were only experiencing a small bump in support from their 2011 numbers.

Forum surveyed 501 residents of the riding on May 17 by IVR, finding that 89% of respondents were aware of Coderre's decision to resign and run for the mayoralty. The poll gave the Liberals 45% support in a new by-election, followed by the Bloc Québécois at 26%, the NDP at 21%, and the Conservatives and Greens at 3% apiece.

That represents only a four-point gain for the Liberals, while the Bloc was up 10 points and the NDP was down 11. Considering the province-wide support for the Liberals and Bloc, this is counter-intuitive.

A few notes about Forum's sample. The same issue of over-sampling older voters and under-sampling younger voters has occurred here. According to Forum's report, 53% of its sample is 55 or older, instead of the 39% it should be for Bourassa. Only 9% of the sample is under the age of 34, instead of the 26% it should be. Only 41 voters aged 18-34 were sampled, which theoretically has a margin of error of +/- 15.3%. Those 41 voters had to be re-weighted to represent some 130 voters, meaning that small, error-prone sample was more than tripled.

In terms of how respondents said they voted in 2011, the sample seems fine for every party but the NDP. Only 20% of respondents said they voted for the NDP in the last federal election, rather than the 32% who actually did. Was the sample re-weighted to reflect this discrepancy? If not, the poll could potentially be under-representing NDP support (though not enough to overturn the overall prognosis).

The number of francophones and non-francophones sampled seems adequate, however, though of course the issue of other discrepancies in the sample still exist. Nevertheless, voting intentions were little different among francophones, with the Liberals down to 43% and the Bloc up to 28%. Among non-francophones, however, the Liberals were way ahead: 69% to only 12% for the NDP and a smattering of support for the other parties.

The by-election in Bourassa could be called many months from now in the fall or even early winter, so there is plenty of time for things to change. Six months ago, the NDP was leading the Liberals in Quebec by 10 points, rather than trailing by 17 as they do now. Where things will be six months from now is anyone's guess. But unless something dramatic occurs before the by-election is held in Quebec, the riding should be considered the Liberals' to lose.


  1. Provincially and federally, Qc seems wide open... Just too many variables. But I can't imagine this riding going any other way than Liberal.

  2. I agree the Liberals have to favoured here. One thing i do predict is that the NDP and the BQ will switch places from what the poll says. I think the NDP will put up a serious fight here, while the BQ will write off Bourassa as unwinnable what with its large non-francophone population as well as the extreme unpopularity of the PQ these days. Look for the BQ to drop to single digits and for the NDP to be the main beneficiary of that collapse

  3. Where did this Bourassa poll come from? It was taken around May 17, and yet we're just hearing about it now in early June. I don't remember seeing it published in May or seeing it in the media like the Labrador by-election polls. Anyway, the Liberals have the edge here based on the history of the seat, but as they learned in Outremont in 2007, they can't take anything for granted. I think Justin Trudeau will be more careful than his predecessor Stéphane Dion, but the NDP will want to make a play here!

    1. The Bourassa poll was not published by any media, Forum just put it on their website a week or two ago.


COMMENT MODERATION POLICY - Please be respectful when commenting. If choosing to remain anonymous, please sign your comment with some sort of pseudonym to avoid confusion. Please do not use any derogatory terms for fellow commenters, parties, or politicians. Inflammatory and overly partisan comments will not be posted. PLEASE KEEP DISCUSSION ON TOPIC.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.