Friday, November 30, 2012

Ontario Liberals gain at expense of NDP

Forum Research is out with a new Ontario provincial poll today, published in the Toronto Star, showing that the Liberals have made big gains over the last four weeks, almost all of it at the expense of the New Democrats. Is it an outlier or a sign that the Ontario Liberal leadership race is improving the fortunes of the party?
Forum was last in the field Oct. 30-31, and since then the Progressive Conservatives have dropped two points to 35%. That still gives them a statistically significant lead over the Liberals, who were up seven points to 29% support. The NDP was down five points to 27%.

The Greens were up one to 8% and 1% of respondents said they would vote for other parties.

The Liberal gain and NDP drop is outside the margin of error, so this is not due to a statistical wobble. Whether it is an outlier result is hard to say - with the leadership race in the news it is not surprising to see the Liberals making gains. If this sort of result had come from Nanos Research, which has been more bullish on the Liberals in Ontario, then it would potentially be less significant. But coming from Forum, which has had the Liberals at 22% and 20% in their last two polls, this is perhaps more meaningful.

A few notes on methodology: Forum conducted this poll over two days, which they also did the last time they polled in Ontario. I applaud this, as their usual one-day snapshots are more susceptible to error. But, as usual, the report contains no information on unweighted samples. It does contain information on how respondents voted in the last provincial election, with that breaking down to about 40% for the Liberals, 33% for the Tories, and 19% for the NDP. The actual results are within the margin of error of the poll, but this does suggest that there is a potential that the sample is slightly more favourable to the Liberals (and Greens and others) than to the Tories and NDP. Whether that is due to lapses in memory or methodological bias is impossible to say.

The Tories were ahead in most parts of the province, with 37% support in the Greater Toronto Area, compared to 31% for the Liberals and 26% for the NDP (down six points). In particular, the PCs were strongest in the 905 area code with 41%, followed by the Liberals at 28% and the NDP at 25%.

The Progressive Conservatives were also ahead in eastern Ontario with 37% to 31% for the Liberals (+12) and 22% for the NDP, while they were in front in southwestern Ontario with 36% to the NDP's 31% and the Liberals' 23%.

The Liberals had the advantage only in the 416 area code, with 36% support to 31% for the Tories and 28% for the NDP. The New Democrats, however, were ahead in the north with 32% to 28% for the Liberals, 25% for the Tories, and 15% for the Greens (+7).

It is worth noting that the Liberals were up in every region of Ontario, while the New Democrats were down across the board. The Liberals had the edge among women by a margin of two points over the NDP, while the Tories were ahead by 15 points among men.

44% of respondents favoured calling an election, compared to 49% who said they were against another election right now. Sadly, 44% might be a good estimation of the next election's turnout.
With these numbers, the PCs would win a minority government of 49 seats, with the Liberals winning 30 and the New Democrats winning 28. But that is a close enough margin to the magic number of 54 seats that a majority government isn't out of the question for Tim Hudak. A continuation of the Liberal government is also theoretically possible, if they could get the support of the NDP.

The Tories win 34 of their seats in eastern, central, and southwestern Ontario, with a smattering of other seats in the Golden Horseshoe. The Liberals win 22 of their seats in and around Toronto, while the New Democrats win their seats in and around Toronto, Hamilton, and northern and southwestern Ontario.

Forum also included some polling on the Ontario Liberal leadership race, showing little change in what the numbers have indicated so far.

Gerard Kennedy topped the list of favourite choices at 16%, followed by Sandra Pupatello at 10% and Kathleen Wynne at 8%. The other candidates scored 3% or less. Fully 30% of respondents said that none of these were their favourite choice, while 27% were undecided.

Kennedy led in and around Toronto and in northern Ontario, while Pupatello led in eastern and southwestern Ontario. That jives pretty well with the regional distribution of Pupatello's caucus support.

Among Liberal supporters, Kennedy managed 25% to 16% for Pupatello and 13% for Wynne. Removing the undecideds and "none of the aboves" gives 38% to Kennedy, 25% to Pupatello, and 20% to Wynne. The other candidates were well behind.

Though Kennedy beat out his competitors on questions of "who cares most about people like you", the economy, likability, and trustworthiness, his numbers were very similar to his overall support. In other words, that tells us little about why Kennedy is favoured.

It will be interesting to see how the numbers fluctuate as the race firms up a little more. Kennedy is the favourite choice of NDP voters, suggesting that he has the greatest potential to draw supporters away from the New Democrats. If Pupatello is chosen, however, she may have more luck attracting Tories to the Liberal fold, keeping the NDP in the race. Combine that with how the PCs threw away their last chance and the next election is wide open.

18 comments:

  1. "Who cares more about people like you?"

    Seriously? That's a real question? How could anyone answer that sensibly?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, it could be answered in terms of "who do you think..."

      It is a bit of a silly question, though. Likability and trustworthiness should cover it.

      Delete
    2. This question appears a lot in market research. "To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 'This product is for people like me'?"

      It's stupid there, and it's stupid here.

      Delete
  2. What does Forum define as 905, and GTA? Are they not supposed to be the same?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The 416 and 905 are the GTA in Forum's polling.

      Delete
    2. So, when you do the projections for GTA subsection, which polling data do you use? 905, or GTA? If the latter, wouldn't that be odd considering you already did the 416 projection in its own subsection? If the former, it's pretty interesting how the PC's only pull 6 seats with 41%, compared to the OLP's 10 at 28%.

      Delete
    3. For now, the model is province-wide. It isn't taking into account regional variations.

      Delete
  3. I agree with the analysis Eric. NDP fears Kennedy like another Justin (progressive image) whereas PCs fear Pupatello (conservative image) Hudak wants Kennedy while Horwath wants Pupatello. Pupatello can look blue collar, feisty etc but when she comes out for Duncanesque austerity, the PS unions will flock to the NDP including the teachers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keep in mind the NDP kicked Kennedy's ass in Parkdale High Park!!!

      Delete
  4. I suspect that Forum includes Hamilton in "905"

    ReplyDelete
  5. More Robocall Scandal

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/11/30/pol-robocalls-investigation-across-canada.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. re: Liberal leadership polls

    I'm surprised by how well Kennedy is polling. I guess high name recognition and limited ties to the current government could work in his favour come election time.

    Whether he will impress Liberal delegates is another thing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Eric: No way to take in the Green effect of the party going all in to elect their leader in Ontario (Guelph) as the GPC did with Elizabeth May?
    (I'll definitely identify as a Green Partisan)

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think the Liberals have their best chance with Wynne. She is doing well with endorsements, and seems like the heir apparent to McGuinty`s policies. She currently has a seat in Queen`s Park and is generally one of the least scandal ridden of senior ministers.

    Pupatello and Kennedy both do not have seats. They can risk humiliation of running in a by-election where they will lose, be premier without a seat or immediately dissolve the government for am election. I think all three options can hurt the Liberals.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm not sure whether Wynne is the heir apparent to McGuinty's policies. She seems to be running to his left, and is one of several leadership candidates who are being critical of Bill 115 (the teacher wage freeze bill). Even Pupatello has been critical of Bill 115. As for the issue of having a seat or not, that is best dealt with after the person has (or has not as the case may be) won the leadership. It cannot be predicted now whether or not a seatless leader could win a by-election or not.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have to admit that one of the reasons I'm gravitating toward Wynne is that she's from a "minority" herself, and seems like she has greater sympathy for harder-to-hear voices. Unlike Pupatello, who seemed to think in the debate that Mitt Romney (a man with a 15% approval rating in Ontario) praising her party's corporate tax policy was something to be proud of, the only thing Wynne seems to have a tin ear for are the voices of intolerance. I would never vote for any leader who doesn't show a similar sensibility. And yes, I do believe that this is why Toronto was so spooked by Hudak in the last election - there are so many minorities in Toronto that there is a hyper-sensitivity to the potential for nativism and xenophobia to make everyone's lives difficult. That's the issue that will override anything else if it comes right down to it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting analysis.

      To add...I think Andrea Horwath and the NDP will have their fingers crossed for a Sandra Pupatello victory. When the Liberals govern or campaign in the center-right, it helps the NDP.

      Likewise, I think Hudak would rather have a left-leaning Liberal such as Wynne, so he can paint the new premier as another tax-and-spend Liberal. Wynne and Horwath can split the center-left vote and allow Hudak to pull ahead.

      Delete
    2. It's not necessarily about left vs. right. And even those split into social and economic.

      We haven't seen very much separation so far among the Liberal candidates, they're all being very vague. If they continue like that, it's going to come down to who's seen as the most likeable and generally competent (which might even be the best way to judge someone, in the end).

      I keep hearing that Wynne is left-leaning, but I haven't seen anything concrete to show it in this campaign so far, except for her statements about inclusiveness at her launch. I don't think most Ontarians are scared of someone being socially open-minded (at least, not enough of them). It's a lack of fiscal discipline and honesty that is disliked, and we haven't seen ANY of the candidates clear the air there.

      In any case, I don't know if it's a good idea for the Liberals to try to win votes from the Tories. It seems like all the movement lately has been on the left side of the spectrum.

      Delete

COMMENT MODERATION POLICY - Please be respectful when commenting. If choosing to remain anonymous, please sign your comment with some sort of pseudonym to avoid confusion. Please do not use any derogatory terms for fellow commenters, parties, or politicians. Inflammatory and overly partisan comments will not be posted. Please keep discussion on topic.