Thursday, January 19, 2012

Mulcair edges Nash in NDP leadership poll

Forum Research and The National Post released a new NDP leadership poll last night, indicating that Thomas Mulcair remains the favourite of both Canadians and NDP supporters. But what does it mean?
Once again, the sample size of NDP supporters, particularly of decided NDP supporters, is very small. The small size of the sample gives the poll a relatively large margin of error, making it difficult to discern any trends since Forum last reported.

But among decided NDP supporters (which, I should emphasize, do not necessarily share the opinions of the NDP members who will actually choose the next leader), Thomas Mulcair leads with 36% support, down nine points since Forum's December survey.

Peggy Nash follows with 20%, up four points, while Brian Topp and Paul Dewar are tied for third with 11%. At the very least, this survey seems to confirm the perceived frontrunners. Whether that has more to do with name recognition than anything real, however, is impossible to say.

Roméo Saganash leads the next tier with 8% (+1), followed by Nathan Cullen at 7% (+3), Martin Singh at 4% (-1), and Niki Ashton with 3% (-5).

If we include the undecideds, however, which number 48% of NDP supporters, we get Mulcair at 19%, Nash at 10%, Topp and Dewar at 6%, Saganash and Cullen at 4%, Singh at 2%, and Ashton at 1%. It is noteworthy that among this group of NDP supporters, Mulcair is falling while Nash, Topp, and (especially) Dewar have made gains.

Among all Canadians, Thomas Mulcair is the preferred choice at 14%, followed by Peggy Nash at 6% and Brian Topp and Paul Dewar at 5%. Fully 62% have no opinion.

It may be a knock against him, but Thomas Mulcair is also the preferred choice of Conservatives (11%), Liberals (13%), and Bloc supporters (33%). That may also be an indication that he has the best chance of winning new support.

Regionally, and without removing the undecideds, Thomas Mulcair leads among NDP supporters in Quebec (42%) and Atlantic Canada (6%), where he is tied with Brian Topp. The Quebec number is actually quite astounding, as only 42% of NDP supporters in that province are undecided. That contrasts very sharply with the 65% of undecideds in Ontario, 69% of undecideds in the four western provinces, and the 81% of undecideds in Atlantic Canada.

Peggy Nash leads in Ontario (10%), while Topp leads in the Prairies (9%) and British Columbia (6%).

Obviously, Quebec is Mulcair's best region. Ontario is the best region for Nash and Dewar (9%), which should come as no surprise as, like Mulcair, that is their home region. The Prairies is the best region for Topp, which again is not surprising as Topp made his name with the Saskatchewan NDP. Oddly, British Columbia is the best region for Saganash (6%) but also for Nathan Cullen (5%), while Singh's best result came in Quebec (3%) and Niki Ashton's came in the Prairies (5%).

What this indicates is that, with the exception of Saganash and Singh, the native region of each candidate is the region where they have the most support. This might also be the case on the convention floor (virtual or otherwise), but it might also be caused by name recognition.

But what do these levels of support mean in the context of the NDP's leadership race? Mulcair's numbers are undoubtedly inflated due to his lead in Quebec, which at last count contains only 6% of the party's membership.

If we weigh the results of this poll by the proportion of members each region contains (based on the numbers the party last released), we get a much closer result:

19% - Thomas Mulcair
19% - Brian Topp
16% - Peggy Nash
13% - Paul Dewar
9% - Roméo Saganash
8% - Nathan Cullen
8% - Niki Ashton
6% - Martin Singh

This is also a quite plausible result. Mulcair's strength is diminished as Quebec gives him less real votes than either Ontario or the Prairies, and just as many as he earns in British Columbia. Topp, on the other hand, builds his support on the four western provinces, where he receives almost four-fifths of his votes. Peggy Nash is strongest in Ontario, as is Dewar, while Cullen banks on British Columbia and Ashton on the Prairies. Saganash's numbers are perhaps exaggerated by his B.C. result.

Whether or not these are the numbers we'll see on March 24, they do reveal the problem with Thomas Mulcair's campaign. He is overwhelmingly the favourite of Quebecers, but they can only give him so many votes. Topp may not be dominating east of Saskatchewan, but he is strong in the provinces that have a lot of members, while Nash and Dewar have a solid base in Ontario.

Based on information published in the media from Brian Topp's campaign, however, there does seem to be an indication that membership numbers in Quebec have ballooned to somewhere closer to 15% of the total membership. If that is truly the case, then Mulcair will have a very good chance of coming out on top, and perhaps by a wide margin, on the first ballot.

Where he'll end up on the second and subsequent ballots, however, is the real question. The other three frontrunners seem to have a higher chance of earning second ballot support, particularly Paul Dewar and Peggy Nash.

Mulcair's campaign is centred on expanding the NDP's support beyond its traditional base. He may also be expanding the NDP's membership in that way as well. But he'll still need more than 50% of the votes on March 24, and that means getting support from the rank-and-file members who were there long before Mulcair was even an MP. 


  1. Bonjour, je travaille sur la campagne de Brian Topp. Est-ce que c'est possible de m'envoyer un courriel pour communiquer avec vous à l'avenir? ericdemers.mtl (a)

  2. Regardless of the poll results, this leadership race is somewhat outside the realm of national media pundits. Mulcair's very real lack of support among those MPs who found him very difficult to work with is not being acknowledged. But those MPs are working to gather votes from the NDP membership, which is by far the majority and outside Quebec. It would take a miracle to increase the Quebec membership from the pre-August number of 1500 members to anything close to the 30,000 BC now has.

    The defections of two Mulcair supporters, Lise St.Denis to the Liberals federally and Daniel Breton to the Parti Quebecois are also not going to help Mulcair. Why are these high profile Mulcair supporters leaving him now? There was no anglo media coverage of the second defection of Daniel Breton, but it shows that all is not quiet on the eastern front!

  3. I am sorry to see this discussion devolve to anonymous attacks on Tom Mulcair based on innuendo and gossip.

    While I am certain the NDP's membership in Quebec will rise because of the leadership contest, I am at a loss to think of anyone who would suggest that it would need be close that of BC for Mulcair to win.

    The implication being that Mulcair does not attract support outside Quebec, or does not have MP's supporting him from across Canada is obviously wrong. The recent endorsement of BC MP Don Davies being one example.

    Many also argue that the defection of Lise St.Denis in fact helps Mulcair, since he is running a campaign on the need to solidify the gains in Quebec before the NDP could form government.

  4. It is laughable, that anyone would take seriously, a poll by the National Post of the NDP leadership candidates. With Mulcair shown as leading, one can only assume that the very conservative National Post feels most comfortable with a former Quebec Liberal leading the NDP, than any of the longtime and committed social democrats who are running.

  5. What about the recent Abacus poll which also gives Mulcair a strong lead among NDP supporters?

  6. There is no such poll, the Abacus poll was about name recognition.


COMMENT MODERATION POLICY - Please be respectful when commenting. If choosing to remain anonymous, please sign your comment with some sort of pseudonym to avoid confusion. Please do not use any derogatory terms for fellow commenters, parties, or politicians. Inflammatory and overly partisan comments will not be posted. PLEASE KEEP DISCUSSION ON TOPIC.