Friday, February 17, 2012

Parti Québécois minority?

The latest numbers from Léger Marketing, published in the Journal de Montréal yesterday, caused quite a stir. They placed the Liberals, Parti Québécois, and Coalition Avenir Québec in a three-way tie, suggesting that the CAQ is slipping and the PQ, written off only weeks ago, is on the upswing.
Léger was last in the field January 23-25, so only a few weeks ago. Since then, the Liberals have gained three points and are tied with the Parti Québécois at 29%. The PQ has picked four points since Léger's last poll.

The CAQ, meanwhile, has dropped again - this time by four points to 28% support, putting them in third. Since the party was launched in November, no poll has put the CAQ at anywhere but first place, while the PQ was last tied for the lead in Léger's polling in June 2011.

Québec Solidaire is down one point to 8% while the Greens are down two to 4%.

This is a huge change in Quebec. The PQ was on the road to catastrophe, following in the footsteps of the Bloc Québécois's debacle in May 2011. The CAQ was going to romp to victory, but instead we have a close three-way race between the parties, meaning anyone could come out on top.

But at the moment the PQ has the advantage. That is because they lead among francophone Quebecers with 35% to 32% for the CAQ. That is a gain of five points for the PQ and a drop of four for the CAQ. The Liberals trail with 19%, up one point since the end of January.

This lead among francophones gives the PQ a big advantage outside of Montreal and Quebec City. They lead there with 37%, up 11 points since the end of January. The CAQ is down eight to 30% while the Liberals are down one to 20%.

The Liberals lead in the Montreal RMR with 35% (+5) against only 25% for the CAQ (-1) and 23% for the PQ (-2). The Liberals are tied with the CAQ in the Quebec City RMR with 32% (+5 for the Liberals, -1 for the CAQ). The PQ is well behind at 22%.

But Léger also released more detailed regional data, which they acquired thanks to their large sample size. I've removed QS, the PVQ, and the Others from the chart to make it a bit easier to read (QS and the PVQ are generally uniform anyway).
What this shows is that the province is very clearly divided up between the three parties. The Liberals lead in Montréal, the Montérégie, and in the Outaouais, while the CAQ leads in the Capitale-Nationale, Chaudière-Appalaches, and Laval/Laurentides/Lanaudière.

The PQ leads in the rest of the province: Bas-Saint-Laurent/Gaspésie, Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Mauricie, Estrie/Centre-du-Québec, Abitibi-Témicamingue/Nord-du-Québec, and the Côte-Nord.

Put more simply, the Liberals lead in Montreal and south of the city as well as in the Outaouais (the more federalist and anglophone parts of Quebec), the CAQ leads around Quebec City and north of Montreal (francophone middle-class areas that the ADQ performed well in back in 2007), and the PQ leads in the rest of the province (francophone, rural, and more isolated parts of the province).

If we look at it in terms of regions where parties are doing better than they are in Quebec as a whole, we see that the Liberals are doing well in the Chaudière-Appalaches (south of Quebec City) region as well as in the three regions in which they lead. That means that the CAQ will have some competition in one part of the province that is supposed to be more of a fortress for them.

It also shows that the PQ will be competitive in the Laval/Laurentides/Lanaudière regions north of Montreal, another part of the province that is supposed to be CAQ-territory.

The CAQ is also over-achieving in the Mauricie, Estrie/Centre-du-Québec, Montérégie, Abitibi-Témiscamingue/Nord-du-Québec, and Côte-Nord regions. This indicates that the CAQ will be able to put up a fight against the PQ in some of the francophone parts of the province and against the Liberals in the southern suburbs of Montreal.

In other words, an extraordinarily competitive election. The island of Montreal is safely Liberal, the PQ is safe in the Lac-Saint-Jean and northern Quebec regions, and the CAQ is well-positioned (but not dominant) in ADQ-friendly territory in and around Quebec City. But aside from that almost every riding will be hotly contested.

And this means a very divided National Assembly. Though the Quebec projection model is not 100% completed yet, it has been updated to reflect the new electoral boundaries. By-elections are also taken into account but not all factors have been applied.

With these numbers, and thanks to their lead among francophones, the Parti Québécois wins 49 seats, enough for a minority government if the CAQ decides not to prop-up the Liberals, who win 41 seats. The CAQ wins 33 seats and Québec Solidaire takes two.

But these are very close seat results, suggesting that any outcome is possible. The most likely scenario, however, points to a PQ minority with the Liberals forming the Official Opposition and the CAQ not far behind.

The Parti Québécois wins most of its seats in the regions of Quebec with 38. They take another 10 in the Montreal RMR and one in and around Quebec City.

The Liberals win most of their seats in and around Montreal, taking 33. They win four in Quebec City and another four in the rest of the province.

The CAQ wins 13 seats in and around Montreal, six in and around Quebec City, and 14 in the rest of Quebec.

What is interesting about this projection is how it demonstrates what the change in the electoral boundaries does. When writing my Huffington Post article yesterday I did a quick projection using the old boundaries and came up with 53 PQ, 41 PLQ, and 29 CAQ seats. With the boundaries being tweaked and the Montreal area gaining a few extra seats that have been removed from rural parts of the province, the result is that the PQ is penalized to the benefit of the Liberals and the CAQ, who are stronger in and around Montreal.

With demographics favouring the metropolis, the electoral advantage the Parti Québécois has enjoyed in the past due to its support among francophones is being reduced somewhat. With the voting intentions of Quebecers being split three-ways, and with Québec Solidaire strong enough to siphon off enough support to play the PQ spoiler in more than a few ridings, the next election in Quebec could result in something completely unexpected.


  1. Intéressant et très bien écrit, comme d'habitude. Merci M. Grenier.

  2. Il semble y avoir un problème dans la projection. Lorsque j'additionne les sièges de chaque parti, ça me donne 131 sièges. Donc 6 de trop...

  3. Oups, oui. La CAQ est à 33, pas 39.

  4. Il s'agissait d'une erreur dans le graphique seulement.

  5. Je pense que c'est plus probable qu'il aura une coalition entre CAQ et les Liberaux.

  6. Hey Éric, fascinating projections! Will you be posting a riding by riding projection at some point?

  7. Yes, I'm looking to set something up similar to what I have going for Alberta soon.

  8. I have my doubts that Pauline could get the PQ elected if an election was called tomorrow. However,I think that if that he's been outed could lead the party to victory

    1. That Trudeau is still a diehard federalist. He just misspoke.

      Because really, him leader of the PQ? HA!

  9. Goaltender Interference19 February, 2012 13:13

    "... the Parti Québécois wins 49 seats, enough for a minority government if the CAQ decides not to prop-up the Liberals"

    I can't see any scenario in which the CAQ would have an incentive to prop up a Liberal government if no party got a majority in the next election.

    Why become a junior coalition partner when instead you can become an opposition party able to defeat a government and cause an election whenever is favourable to you?

    If it was still the old ADQ with only a few members and no hope to form a government, that would be a different story. But I can't see Legault having spent two years to create a new political party just to become a subordinate of Charest or Marois after then next election -- after all, he could have just joined the PQ or Liberals if he wanted to get back into politics without leading the party.

  10. Liberals get first crack at forming government but that's only if Charest decides not to resign on election night.

    So assuming Marois is up to bat first against a leaderless Liberal party and the CAQ in a minority situation I see zero incentive for Legault to support her.

    Let the Liberals blink first and support the PQ.

    Or vote down Marois, vote down whoever the Liberals put up, and then let Legault cobble together a majority from PQ and Liberal defections.

  11. @Goaltender: I'm not sure I agree. A coalition where the CAQ had a much smaller share of government seats, I would agree, but in a coalition where they could count on almost half of the ministry and a roughly equal say in policy, the upside would outweigh the possible downside. Part of the knock on the CAQ is whether you can trust them in government. That becomes easier if they have experience in government.

    They also retain the ability to help defeat the government by dropping out of a coalition and joining the PQ in a non-confidence vote.

    The big downside for a junior coalition is taking all the blame if the economy goes south and austerity is needed. The CAQ is insulated twice over: first, austerity is part of their manifesto, so they won't be seen as selling out by supporting it, and second, their relative size should help. The Liberal Democrats in the UK and the FDP in Germany are disproportionately taking the blame for coalition policies in those countries, but in each case, the liberal party is small, and the salient policies are unpopular with its base.

  12. Hello Eric,

    How are you doing projections with the new boundaries? Did you go through the polls results of 2008 and re-calculate almost everything? I read the DGEQ had such a document but can't find it anywhere.

  13. I contacted Elections Quebec.

  14. Results of the 2008 election and bye elections after that on the new map


COMMENT MODERATION POLICY - Please be respectful when commenting. If choosing to remain anonymous, please sign your comment with some sort of pseudonym to avoid confusion. Please do not use any derogatory terms for fellow commenters, parties, or politicians. Inflammatory and overly partisan comments will not be posted. PLEASE KEEP DISCUSSION ON TOPIC.