Wednesday, March 9, 2011

No arena funding puts two Tory seats at risk in Quebec City

A new, and very interesting, flash poll by Léger Marketing conducted for a few radio stations in Quebec City (including FM93, a radio station that invited me to speak with them last month, though I'm not sure if the interview is still somewhere on their site) shows that the Conservatives have tanked in the Quebec City region, and are now at risk of losing two and maybe even all three of their seats in the Quebec City region (north of the St. Lawrence).

This online poll (though Léger has a randomly chosen panel) was taken on March 7th only. I usually look a little askew at one-day polls.

But according to the results, the Bloc Québécois is leading in the region with 44%, well ahead of the Conservatives who are at 20%. Even they aren't far ahead of the Liberals and New Democrats, who each have 17% support.

While shocking to see the Conservative base here fall away in Quebec City, the findings of the Léger poll give a partial explanation as to why this is the case.

Fully 72% of people in the Quebec City region do not support the government's decision to provide no funding for the new arena. Only 22% agree with the government's decision, which would still be a big drop in support for the Conservatives if all of those people vote Tory.

What does this mean, in practical terms?

Well, by my estimation that would certainly put Beauport - Limoilou and Charlesbourg - Haute-Saint-Charles in the Bloc's column, along with André Arthur's riding of Portneuf - Jacques Cartier. That would leave Josée Verner in Louis-Saint-Laurent as the only Conservative MP from Quebec City, aside from Jacques Gourde and Steven Blaney across the river in Lotbinière and Lévis. I already have the Conservatives losing Montmagny to the southeast of the city, and this poll only makes that call more likely.

But even Verner would be in trouble, as I have her only holding on to her riding by her finger nails with these numbers/

The Conservatives can't even turn things around dramatically if they do decide to provide funding for the arena. According to the poll, with federal funding for the arena the Bloc would still have 39% support, well ahead of the Conservatives at 28%. That does bring the Tories back up to about where they were in 2008, but the Bloc is in a better position. That still means Arthur could be out, as well as Sylvie Boucher in Beauport - Limoilou.

This is bad news for the Conservatives. They appear to be well in range of a majority, but only just. Losing a couple seats in Quebec City could be disastrous. And with the Speaker's two rulings against the Conservatives today, I have trouble believing that their numbers elsewhere in Canada are going to be able to make up for it.


  1. Could it also work the other way by GAINING seats in other regions, such as Ontario or British Columbia, where the perception that "Quebec gets everything" exists?

  2. Pandering to Quebec wont do the Tories any good anyway

  3. The Tories were really DUMB to let the issue of whether or not they would fund the arena fester for seven months. If they had just given a flat NO last Fall this issue would be water under the bridge by now.

  4. DL a flat no would have been a disaster.

    At least now the MPs could say they tried and they considered all the options.

    Anything less and I wouldn't be surprised if the mayor had gone all Danny Williams on them.

    Instead they let him get out ahead of their decision and now we know the arena is going to be built no matter what.

    Also, there's going to be some secondary funding to the arena project in terms of the surrounding infrastructure.

    That's a fig leaf the MPs will latch on to.

  5. Charest is paying for half the arena ($200 million). Plus a few months ago, he awarded a subway car building project without going to tenders (raising the contract price by hundreds of millions) in order to have a factory built in the suburbs of Quebec City. He's still polling third in Quebec City and will likely win zero seats there.


COMMENT MODERATION POLICY - Please be respectful when commenting. If choosing to remain anonymous, please sign your comment with some sort of pseudonym to avoid confusion. Please do not use any derogatory terms for fellow commenters, parties, or politicians. Inflammatory and overly partisan comments will not be posted. PLEASE KEEP DISCUSSION ON TOPIC.