Tuesday, April 5, 2011

And now double-digit leads for no one

Yesterday, the daily poll summary showed double-digit leads from EKOS Research, Nanos Research, and Léger Marketing. Now, with new polls from Nanos and Harris-Decima, that lead stands at between 7 and 9.6 points. What happened?
Both Harris-Decima and Nanos are showing the same trend, that of a narrowing gap between the Conservatives and the Liberals. Compared to Harris-Decima's last poll taken between March 24 and March 27, just before the campaign began, the Conservatives have dropped three points while the Liberals have gained four. That has turned what was a 14-point lead into a seven point lead.

For Nanos, if we compare this three-day rolling poll to the last completely different three-day rolling poll (March 30-April 1), we also see the gap narrowing. However, it isn't as stark. In that last rolling poll Nanos had the two parties at 41.3% and 30.3%, a gap of 11 points. Three days later, the two parties are at 39.8% and 30.2%, a gap of 9.6 points. Whereas Harris-Decima's variations are significant, Nanos could just be wobbling within the sampling margin of error. But a consistent trend over two pollsters is something to note.

The two pollsters disagree in Ontario, on the other hand. Harris-Decima has the gap widening by three points, with the Conservatives gaining five and the Liberals gaining two. In the Nanos poll, we have the Conservatives dropping five and the Liberals gaining almost seven points. This means that Nanos has gone from a 10.5-point Conservative lead to a 1.5-point Liberal lead. That is a huge shift, one not borne out by the other pollsters, so we should wait and see whether this is just a "blip", as The Globe and Mail put it.

But if I input these Nanos numbers into the model for Ontario only, I get 46 seats for the Conservatives, 49 for the Liberals, and 11 for the NDP. It's not enough to put Michael Ignatieff in 24 Sussex, but it is part of the equation.

In Quebec, both pollsters have the Bloc relatively stable and the Conservatives dropping by five points. But in Nanos that means a healthy 26.7% turning into a still-decent 22%, whereas in Harris-Decima the party has gone from 22% to 17%. That both pollsters find the Tories dropping in Quebec is noteworthy, and they also both put the Liberals at roughly 19% in the province.

One of things I was looking for in Nanos's Quebec numbers was whether the NDP would get a bump because of Jack Layton's appearance on Tout le monde en parle. As the show airs relatively late on Sundays, any bump would not have been recorded in yesterday's poll.

But it would be recorded in today's tracking poll, and lo and behold the NDP is up one point to 17.9% in Quebec. Of course, that could be the MOE at play, but I will be watching the NDP's Quebec numbers closely over the next two days. If there is a noticeable bump, it will be something to watch for when Gilles Duceppe, Michael Ignatieff and (maybe?) Stephen Harper make their inevitable appearances.

By the by, comparing the NDP's numbers in Nanos's last three-day poll in Quebec to the one out today shows the NDP up almost five points in the province. Harris-Decima has the party up one point.

Elsewhere, we can note the similar results in Atlantic Canada in these two polls. A close race, and the NDP is not where they have historically been. British Columbia is more of a wash, though. It has been one of the provinces most difficult to get consistent results from of late. Volatility, or coincidence?

Harris-Decima also had some leadership questions in their survey. The most interesting result is that Michael Ignatieff's favourability rating has gone from 25% to 37% since February. He still lags behind Harper (45% favourable to 52% unfavourable), but has a similar unfavourability rating: 54%. Not surprisingly, Duceppe is very well liked in Quebec while Layton is still the most popular leader in Canada (63% favourable).

A general overview of the polling numbers and the campaign up to this point tells me that the Liberals are poised to make some gains. Ignatieff's numbers are improving and the party has gotten some half-decent polling results as well. Yet the Conservatives are still very strong, and the polls aren't moving as much as you might expect. My own projection puts them at a virtual majority.

That leaves us with the one question that will decide this campaign: are the numbers stagnant because it is too early in the campaign to expect Canadians to be paying attention, or are the numbers stagnant simply because Canadians have already made up their minds?

The questions asked by each of the pollsters are as follows: "For those parties you would consider voting federally, could you please rank your top two current local preferences?" (Nanos). "If a federal election were being held tomorrow, who do you think you would be voting for in your area?" (Harris-Decima)


  1. I have a feeling this will be a race down to the wire. A minority for someone !

  2. When looking at the individual riding breakdown there is an error in Jeanne--Le Ber, where I live. It mentions as of today 0.7% going to "other" but other than the 5 major parties listed there are no other candidates. Last election an independent ran but he has no intention of running again this time, so who is "other"?

  3. Mathieu,

    The Rhinoceros Party listed a candidate on their website for this riding. Once the complete lists of candidates is finalized by Elections Canada, I will update my own projections.

  4. One thing I'm curious about is the 'undecided' vote. Is that still a factor?

  5. John from Whitby05 April, 2011 20:15

    Tory support is rock solid behind their leader. Liberals don't even like their own leader. Liberal gains are at the expense of the NDP and will be concentrated in the only place they are strong...Toronto, so it will not translate into more seats. The economy is the key question and the Liberals have pledged to implement green taxes, overspend, and raise taxes (putting jobs at risk). This new platform is only beginning to sink in (until recently many Paul Martin Liberals wrongly assumed their party was fiscally conservative). My guess is the numbers will remain static (people have made up their minds) and the issue of whether Harper gets a majority or a minority will be decided by which party gets the vote out. Liberal voters skew young while Tories skew older. Older people are more likely to vote than younger people. Tory voters are more motivated than Liberal voters (many of whom don't like Ignatieff and may not bother voting at all). And the Tory election machine is more efficient at getting out the vote. These factors militate towards a Tory majority (which polls consistently show is close). If threehundredeight's seat projection is at 148 or more on election day, I predict the Tories organizational machine and built in advantages (in terms of turn out) will get them their majority.

  6. The Harris-Decima poll indicated that the favourability rating of Ignatieff among Liberal voters has grown by quite a bit (77% from 57%), so I think Liberals are starting to get behind their party leader.

  7. Agree wtih Eric. For the longest time, even a significant number of Liberal Party members thought Iggy to be an unfortunate dud. However, he has so far proven that to be wrong and even skeptics are coming on board now behind him. One big reason is so far, he (and Donolo) have run a really good campaign - so unlike the last election when Dion and his crew stumbled from one disaster to the next and everyone was nervous about what the leader was going to say. Win or lose, most Liberals are feeling pretty good right now.

  8. This is an amusing election. There is a little blood in the water now, and the CPC is looking lame. It will be interesting to see whether the CPC will hold fast, or blink, and change channels. That will smell of desperation, and they will be fried. Or they stay the course, and die a death of a million cuts. They are in a cleft stick now.
    When the debate comes, and a few million more Canadians discover that Ignatief isn't a fire breathing demon....
    As I said, this is an interesting, and instructive campaign.

  9. Goaltender Interference06 April, 2011 08:06

    As I said last week, some narrowing of the gap early on in the campaign was almost inevitable as the opposition parties parties got a higher profile in the news and through advertising. It happened to the Liberals when they were in power: they would start the campaign with 30 or 40 point leads, only to have it narrow a lot as the opposition parties (especially the PCs and NDP, which maintained low profiles in Parliament) got more media and ad coverage.

    Given the absence of any defining issue in this campaign, debate performance could send polls in any direction. Everything before the debate is really just a warm-up.

  10. PETER that's total bunk.

    They looked at figures showing the decline of Ontario's manufacturing sector and decided corporate tax cuts were to blame ?


    Did they look at other jurisdictions to control for confounding factors ?

    Did they think the rise of China might have something to do with it ?

    That article was neither here nor there. Almost every economic expert agrees with these corporate tax cuts.

    Except some people at a newsroom apparently!

    Not sure why you posted that link at all.

  11. Sorry Shadow but your re-issue of the CPC "talking points" minus a link comes across as mere SPIN.

    Try again when you are more grown up !!

    Oh and consult Stiglitz !!



COMMENT MODERATION POLICY - Please be respectful when commenting. If choosing to remain anonymous, please sign your comment with some sort of pseudonym to avoid confusion. Please do not use any derogatory terms for fellow commenters, parties, or politicians. Inflammatory and overly partisan comments will not be posted. PLEASE KEEP DISCUSSION ON TOPIC.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.