The Greens are up one to 11%, while the Bloc Québécois is up one to 10%.
As to the long-gun registry, the NDP vote seems to have slipped mostly among women and urban voters, exactly who you would expect to be upset with the NDP's fence-sitting position on this issue. And to provide some context as to how bad this 14% is, this is the lowest national number the NDP currently has in my projection.
Speaking of which, with the New Brunswick election in full swing I haven't had the time to update the site's federal projection. I will try to do it this week, but it may wait until after the New Brunswick election takes place on September 27th.
The Liberals are leading in Ontario with 37%, up one from August. The Conservatives are unchanged at 35%, but the NDP is down four big points to 14%. The Greens are up two to 12%. The race is a close one in Ontario, but any lead for the Liberals is certainly good news. If we buy that the NDP is hurting because of the registry, we can expect the Liberals to be benefiting.
The Bloc is up one in Quebec and leads with 38%, followed by the Liberals at 25% (up three). The Conservatives are down one to 14%, indicating that perhaps the arena-funding in Quebec City is not all that it is cracked up to be in the polls. The NDP is unchanged at 9% in the province.
In British Columbia, the Conservatives are up five points to 37%, followed by the Liberals at 27% (up six). The NDP have taken a huge step backwards on the West Coast, dropping 10 points to 20%. In a smaller poll a drop like that might be suspicious, but recall that Harris-Decima polled more than 2,000 people nationally.
The Liberals are down 11 points in Atlantic Canada but still lead with 34%. The Conservatives are up five to 33%, while the NDP is up the same amount to 23%.
The Conservatives lead in Alberta with 61%, followed by the Liberals at a very good 21%.
In the Prairies, the Conservatives lead with 42% while the Liberals and NDP are deadlocked with 24% and 23%, respectively.
The Liberals would win 51 seats in Ontario, 21 in the West and North, 18 in Atlantic Canada, and 17 in Quebec for a total of 107.
The Bloc would win 53 seats in Quebec.
The NDP is hit hard in this poll, and would win only 12 seats in Ontario, six in the West, and four in Atlantic Canada for a total of 22.
The result matches the 2006 election pretty closely.
If this poll is to be believed, the long-gun registry may be just the thing the Liberals need to separate themselves from the NDP as an alternative to the Conservative government. The Liberals are clearly benefiting in Ontario and British Columbia, two regions that are integral to their electoral hopes. The Conservatives don't seem to be the beneficiary directly, however, though they might certainly benefit from vote splitting at the riding level.
This new storyline in the polls needs to be borne out by a few others before we can definitively say that the optics have hurt the NDP. In all likelihood, Jack Layton's efforts will prove to be successful and the registry will survive for the time being. But being exposed as a social democratic party with some less than progressive policy positions will hurt the party no matter what happens at the vote tomorrow.
For what it's worth, my updated projection essentially agrees with Eric's current dated projection. But Eric's model typically gives more seats to the Liberals and fewer to the NDP than mine; it also puts greater weight on older polls. So I'm looking forward to an update, to see how numbers compare!
ReplyDeleteWhat's your regional breakdown for this HD poll?
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, if the gun registry really was such an issue - how do you explain the NDP increasing by 4% in Quebec in the latest Leger poll and also gaining ground in BC in the last Ekos poll.
ReplyDeleteWho knows what causes these fluctuations - its not as if HD or anyone else isolated the 2% of the population who would have voted NDP three weeks and now wouldn't asked them why they changed their minds? It's all idle speculation and when you are a pollster/pundit - there is always an expectation that you will have some "ex cathedra" explanation for every fluctuation. I'm not saying that Allan Gregg's theory is impossible - just that we don't really know since numbers seem to bounce around all the time within a certain range and sometimes its just coincidence or statistical noise. But let's be clear, there is a difference between advancing a hypothesis and making a statement of fact as if it is grounded in fact.
I have:
ReplyDeleteAtlantic: L 17, C 11, N 4
Quebec: L 16, C 8, N 1, B 50
Ontario: L 49, C 44, N 13
West/North: C 69, N 14, L 12
Total: C 132, L 94, B 50, N 32
It looks like our disagreement is mainly about the West, where I'm much kinder to the NDP, and much harsher on the Liberals. Also, we seem to disagree on what's going on in Quebec with the Tories. Otherwise, our results are very similar.
Éric: The NDP have taken a huge step backwards on the West Coast, dropping 10 points to 20%. In a smaller poll a drop like that might be suspicious, but recall that Harris-Decima polled more than 2,000 people nationally.
ReplyDeleteThe national poll size is respectable, but if my estimates are correct the error in BC will be over 6% one time in twenty. That could be a large part of the explanation for the NDP fall.
I smell desperation from Harper. As a columnist in the star said, there are important issues not being debated, the economy and the governments debt reduction plan, global warming, international poverty and disease reduction plans. Harper knows he is vulnerable on the economy-1B for the summit, 9B for new jails despite a falling crime rate, 16B for new planes, reductions in business tax rates and 12B/yr gone from the GST result in a huge structural deficit before the recession. NDP support will seep back when the LG is saved.
ReplyDelete